A little while back I saw
Law Abiding Citizen and I think it’s about time I wrote a bit about it.
I think the delay is mostly due to my rampant ambivalence towards it, it’s not brilliant, but it’s not particularly bad either. As I ineloquently summed it up at the time:
‘s’alright, I s’pose’.
The story follows Gerard Butler, who plays someone called Clyde. His family is brutally murdered in front of him, and the law lets him down by letting one of the baddies go free in exchange for dobbing in his accomplice. Gerard decides everything is wrong with the world and swears revenge before systematically killing lots of people. Conveniently, Clyde is some sort of ex-superspy and is very good at doing this in unfeasible and theatrical ways, and then it goes a bit wrong for him, the end.
That’s it. I summed the film up in four whole sentences.
Now, I would suggest that revenge films are quite hard to get wrong, admittedly, not all of them can explore the use of claw hammers in modern dentistry or comedy rhyming potential of names like ‘Buck’*, but this one manages it. Clyde, our anti-hero, is a bit of a non-character. As a man bent on revenge, he could have taken on any slightly loopy archetype you like, from Hannibal Lecter to Ed Norton’s character in Se7en (I think he was called John Doe). He was none of these, and I just kept thinking about how he looks like a bit like a melted version of Russell Crowe.
Sadly, the whole film is spun around this rather weak, undecided character, so when Clyde embarks on a bit of
Eli Roth style torture-porn, followed by the use of some
Jackal-esque robo-guns, you are left wondering about the integrity of the whole conception, what exactly does this film want to be? All I want is a bit of consistency.
In conclusion, I wouldn’t bother with it.
~Theo
*If you missed either of these references, consider yourself ill educated and come to see me after class.